E-mail us: service@prospectnews.com Or call: 212 374 2800
Bank Loans - CLOs - Convertibles - Distressed Debt - Emerging Markets
Green Finance - High Yield - Investment Grade - Liability Management
Preferreds - Private Placements - Structured Products
 
Published on 7/13/2017 in the Prospect News High Yield Daily.

Junk funds plummet by $1.14 billion this week, fourth straight fall after three weeks of gains

By Paul Deckelman

New York, July 13 – High-yield mutual funds and exchange-traded funds – considered a reliable barometer of overall junk market liquidity trends – plunged deeper into the red this week, their fourth consecutive downturn after three straight weeks before that of gains, according to numbers released on Thursday.

Sources familiar with the fund-flow statistics generated by AMG Data Services Inc. said that some $1.14 billion more left those weekly reporting-only domestic funds in the form of investor redemptions than came into them during the week ended Wednesday, July 12.

That was almost exactly the same size as the $1.16 billion net outflow reported last Thursday by the Arcata, Calif.-based unit of Thomson Reuters Corp.’s Lipper analytics division for the seven-day period ended July 5.

It was the third straight sizable outflow, including the $1.74 billion cash loss seen during the week ended June 28.

Before that had come a $128 million outflow during the week ended June 21.

Those four most recent outflows, totaling some $4.16 billion, had followed three consecutive weeks of net inflows totaling about $1.31 billion – a $198 million inflow for the week ended June 14 and before that, inflows of $586 million for the week ended June 7 and $521 million during the week ended May 31.

Year-to-date outflow widens

According to a Prospect News analysis of the data, this week’s outflow was the 15th so far this year, versus 13 inflows during that time.

It was the sixth cash loss in the last 10 weeks, dating back to the week ended May 10, versus four inflows during that time.

Besides the aforementioned most recent four outflows and three inflows, that 10-week stretch also included a $568 million outflow during the week ended May 24, a $650 million inflow during the week ended May 17 and a $1.73 billion outflow during the week ended May 10.

This week’s outflow widened the estimated year-to-date net outflow number to $8.87 billion from $7.72 billion last week.

That established a third consecutive new 2017 net outflow wide point.

It was also the biggest cumulative net outflow number the junk funds have seen since the $9.75 billion deficit recorded the week ended Aug. 6, 2014.

Before their headlong plunge into negative territory seen during the last few months, the flows had shown a relatively strong start to the year.

They had posted six inflows during the first 10 reporting weeks of the year, reaching a peak cumulative net inflow total of $1.62 billion during the week ended Feb. 22, and they were still in positive territory for the year to date during the week ended March 1, with a $1.38 billion net inflow, before falling into the red the following week and staying there after that.

Cumulative fund-flow estimates may be revised upward or downward or they may be rounded off and could include unannounced revisions and adjustments to figures from prior weeks.

EPFR sees sizable outflow

Another fund-tracking service, the Cambridge, Mass.-based EPFR Global, meanwhile saw a net outflow from high-yield funds in the latest week that a market source estimated was “about double” the size of the outflow that Lipper/AMG had tabulated.

As was the case with Lipper, it was the fourth consecutive net outflow seen after three straight net inflows.

Last week, the source said, EPFR had seen an outflow “in that same ballpark” as the Lipper figure during the week ended July 5.

During the week ended June 28, the source said that EPFR had seen an outflow “only one-eighth the size” of the Lipper outflow number.

In contrast, during the June 21 week, the source said, EPFR’s reported outflow was an eye-popping “roughly nine times bigger” than the corresponding Lipper outflow number.

EPFR’s methodology differs from Lipper’s, as its fund universe includes many mutual funds and ETFs domiciled outside the United States, such as strictly European junk funds and broader global funds, versus Lipper’s solely domestic orientation.

Because of that difference, while the two services’ overall respective weekly results usually point pretty much in the same general direction in terms of a given week having an inflow or an outflow, and sometimes are actually quite close, as happened last week, other times, the numbers can vary widely, as was the case this week, or during the June 21 and June 28 weeks, as noted.

And occasionally, the two companies’ numbers may even diverge completely, as most recently happened during the week ended May 3, when Lipper saw a $386 million outflow and EPFR calculated a $300 million inflow.

Taking those differences into account, EPFR has now seen 15 inflows so far this year and 13 outflows, versus Lipper, which, as noted, has seen 13 cash gains and 15 cash losses.

IG corporates continue gains

Looking at fund flows for other asset classes during the week, investment-grade corporate funds posted their 30th consecutive gain overall and their 28th straight net inflow this year, with no net outflows yet recorded for 2017.

The Lipper data indicated that the funds saw an inflow of $2.3 billion during the reporting week ended Wednesday.

The week before, ended July 5, had seen a $2.54 billion cash injection.

The latest inflow brought the year-to-date surge so far up to an estimated $70.77 billion this week – the peak 2017 cumulative inflow level so far, versus the $68.47 billion seen last week, the previous high point for the year.


© 2015 Prospect News.
All content on this website is protected by copyright law in the U.S. and elsewhere. For the use of the person downloading only.
Redistribution and copying are prohibited by law without written permission in advance from Prospect News.
Redistribution or copying includes e-mailing, printing multiple copies or any other form of reproduction.