E-mail us: service@prospectnews.com Or call: 212 374 2800
Bank Loans - CLOs - Convertibles - Distressed Debt - Emerging Markets
Green Finance - High Yield - Investment Grade - Liability Management
Preferreds - Private Placements - Structured Products
 
Published on 1/6/2016 in the Prospect News Structured Products Daily.

Bank of America tops league table for U.S. structured products in 2015, Q4, December

By Emma Trincal

New York, Jan. 6 – In a disappointing year, Bank of America as an agent maintained its strong lead in structured notes sales, according to data compiled by Prospect News.

Bank of America sold $13.31 billion in 2015, a 14.5% increase from the $11.64 it priced the year before. The agent remained by far the top player with a 30.37% market share, an advance from 27.35% in 2014.

Moreover, the number of deals distributed by this agent rose to 429 from 381 the year before.

Modest uptick

Volume year over year ended up positive, but the increase was subdued compared to prior years, according to the data.

Agents sold $43.83 billion, a 3% increase from $42.56 billion seen in the previous year.

The league table figures do not include exchange-traded notes. Interest-rate products with a structured coupon but no underlier, such as step-up notes, step-down notes, fixed-to-floating notes and capped floaters, are also not included in the league table totals. Ironically, those two types of products registered significant growth last year.

ETNs were up 46% compared to 2014, growing to $17.8 billion from $12.20 billion. The top agent in this category remained Credit Suisse.

Structured coupon issuance volume rose to $56.67 billion from $40.54 billion in the previous year, a 40% surge. First Tennessee continued to lead in this category.

JPMorgan, Goldman

Coming next after Bank of America, JPMorgan remained the No. 2 agent for the year with $7.05 billion, or 16% of the market, a 2% volume decline from the previous year. This agent saw the number of its deals rise by 17% to 1,729.

Goldman Sachs moved up one notch to third ranking, pushing down UBS to the fourth slot. Goldman Sachs sold 632 deals, a nearly 20% increase from the previous year’s 531 offerings.

This agent pushed up its notional sales nearly 53% to $5.21 billion from $3.41 billion. Part of that growth was due to a few very large deals issued by GS Finance Corp., a subsidiary of Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Toward the end of October in particular, Goldman Sachs priced a $350 million leveraged deal based on the S&P 500 index on the behalf of GS Finance. Another one sold for $250 million, and several others were priced over the $100 million mark.

Fewer deals priced last year in the overall market. The number of offerings dropped 8.5% to 8,457 from 9,232 the year before.

Fourth quarter, December

Bank of America kept its No. 1 slot for the fourth quarter. It sold $2.98 billion in 100 deals, compared with $2.69 billion in 92 deals during the same period the year before. The agent was also on top of the December league table with $913 million priced in 28 offerings.

Indexes on steroids

All asset classes categorized in the league tables saw a drop in volume last year except equity index products, which surged in volume by over a third to $29.43 billion from $22.03 billion. It was good news for the market because these types of structured notes represent about two-thirds of the overall volume, according to data compiled by Prospect News.

Bank of America continued to dominate this asset class, capturing nearly 40% of the volume issued. Its notional sales rose by 25% to $11.62 billion from $9.31 billion, helping Bank of America maintain its well-established lead in the most popular part of the market. This positive contribution to the overall market may have been the reason the past year did not show a negative trend given how much other asset classes fell in volume.

Stocks out of favor

Single stocks for instance suffered a 37.5% drop to $7.17 billion from $11.47 billion. The number of offerings shrunk to 2,930 from 4,549, a 35% decline.

UBS remained the top agent in this category with 27% of the volume, but the number of its offerings fell by 41% to 1,753 from 2,962.

Overall, the number of single stock-linked deals dropped 37.5% from the previous year to 2,930.

Bearish commodities

Commodity-linked issuance last year fell to new record lows, declining 64% to $836 million from $2.32 billion in 2014. Activity in this sector is in dire straits. The year 2014 recorded a temporary recovery with sales up 16% from 2013, but in 2013 and 2012, sales plummeted by 32% and 38%, respectively, from their previous years.

The year 2010 and 2011,while up, showed unimpressive volume increases below 5%, reflecting a persistent downturn in commodities, exacerbated last year by the collapse in oil prices and the rising dollar, according to analysts.

JPMorgan remained the top agent last year in commodities with $384 million in 61 deals, or a 46% market share.

FX, rates

FX continued to be the laggard asset class. Making matters worse, volume in currency-linked notes fell 40.5% to $326 million from $547 million in 2014. The number of deals fell by nearly half to 49 from 93.

JPMorgan kept its top position with 47.5% of the total in $155 million priced in 27 deals.

Interest rate notes – at the exclusion of the structured coupon products as defined earlier – fell by 27% to $1.33 billion from $1.82 billion. Wells Fargo elevated itself from 10th to first in the rankings with $297 million priced in 22 offerings, or 22.3% of the total. The previous winner was Citigroup, now No. 4.

Top issuers

The league table for issuers showed Barclays Bank plc moving up to first in 2015 from third in 2014, all asset classes included.

Barclays brought to market $5.88 billion, or 13.42% of the issuance.

JPMorgan Chase & Co., No. 1 for the previous year, closely followed with $5.62 billion issued.

For the fourth quarter, the top issuer was Bank of America Corp.

Barclays led for the month of December.

The analysis of the leading issuers by asset classes revealed a compartmentalized market.

Credit Suisse AG, London Branch was No. 1 for equity indexes, JPMorgan for single stocks and Wells Fargo & Co. for interest rates. Goldman Sachs led in currencies and Barclays in commodities.

All structured products, no ETNS, by agent, 2015

2014 Comparables

UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Bank of America13.31042930.37%111.64038127.35%
2JPMorgan7.052172916.09%27.218147316.96%
3Goldman Sachs5.21363211.89%43.4105318.01%
4UBS4.555229010.39%35.917347713.90%
5Morgan Stanley3.0535706.97%63.0344777.13%
6Barclays2.7475806.27%53.0605267.19%
7Credit Suisse1.8305404.18%71.5654873.68%
8HSBC1.2865682.93%91.3167613.09%
9Citigroup1.1932972.72%101.2232192.87%
10RBC0.9612662.19%81.5135483.55%
Total43.827845742.5619232
Average size:0.0050.005
All structured products, no ETNS, by agent, fourth quarter
2014 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Bank of America2.97810031.61%12.6929226.78%
2Goldman Sachs1.53614316.30%40.9541359.49%
3JPMorgan0.95433710.12%21.58835115.80%
4UBS0.6423846.82%31.39081913.83%
5Morgan Stanley0.6421366.81%50.9041388.99%
6Credit Suisse0.6321426.70%70.4101414.08%
7Barclays0.5391435.72%60.5181095.16%
8HSBC0.3011293.19%100.2711832.69%
9RBC0.276822.93%80.352933.51%
10Citigroup0.243722.58%120.232552.31%
Total9.422182310.0512216
Average size:0.0050.005
All structured products, no ETNS, by agent, December
2014 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Bank of America0.9132831.95%10.8333027.13%
2JPMorgan0.36011212.61%40.32310710.52%
3UBS0.2751529.62%20.39427412.84%
4Barclays0.242548.46%60.194456.32%
5Morgan Stanley0.173476.05%50.287429.36%
6BMO0.169205.92%70.183105.95%
7Goldman Sachs0.156425.46%30.3514611.44%
8HSBC0.145445.06%100.079592.57%
9Credit Suisse0.131514.60%80.147494.80%
10Wells Fargo0.100163.49%130.02950.95%
Total2.8576233.070734
Average size:0.0050.004
All structured products, by agent, 2015
2014 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Credit Suisse14.457155023.46%29.195133916.79%
2Bank of America13.31042921.60%111.64038121.26%
3UBS7.587231012.31%38.674349015.84%
4JPMorgan7.052172911.44%47.218147313.18%
5Goldman Sachs5.2136328.46%63.4105316.23%
6Barclays4.5665877.41%54.0885357.47%
7Morgan Stanley3.0835715.00%73.1164785.69%
8HSBC1.2865682.09%101.3167612.40%
9Citigroup1.1932971.94%91.3572232.48%
10RBC0.9612661.56%81.5175492.77%
Total61.627955654.75610181
Average size:0.0060.005
ETNS, by agent, 2015
2014 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Credit Suisse12.627101070.94%17.63085262.57%
2UBS3.0322017.04%22.7561322.60%
3Barclays1.819710.22%31.02898.43%
4Nuveen0.152590.85%40.194641.59%
5RBS0.08010.45%60.18231.49%
6Deutsche Bank0.06010.34%50.18421.51%
7Morgan Stanley0.03010.17%80.08310.68%
Total17.800109912.195949
Average size:0.0160.013
Commodity structured products, no ETNS, by agent, 2015
2014 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1JPMorgan0.3846145.90%11.4698263.22%
2Morgan Stanley0.1605419.10%30.2473310.62%
3Citigroup0.088610.50%90.00310.13%
4Goldman Sachs0.08349.88%50.10434.49%
5Bank of America0.06277.45%40.11995.14%
6Barclays0.02412.87%20.2771511.92%
7UBS0.02282.65%60.066252.82%
8Deutsche Bank0.00830.92%70.03361.41%
9BNP0.00650.73%80.00640.26%
Total0.8361492.323178
Average size:0.0060.013
Equity index structured products, no ETNS, by agent, 2015
2014 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Bank of America11.61733339.47%19.30828542.26%
2Goldman Sachs4.40453114.96%32.37341210.78%
3JPMorgan3.61487312.28%22.51051011.40%
4UBS2.2633527.69%41.8073478.20%
5Barclays1.7883746.08%70.9952154.52%
6Credit Suisse1.4773905.02%61.0573394.80%
7Morgan Stanley1.3322444.53%51.2052055.47%
8HSBC0.8193672.78%80.7945073.61%
9Citigroup0.5891612.00%110.285771.29%
10Deutsche Bank0.551661.87%90.665763.02%
Total29.431401322.0273180
Average size:0.0070.007
Foreign exchange structured products, no ETNS, by agent, 2015
2014 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1JPMorgan0.1552747.48%10.2424844.16%
2Morgan Stanley0.083225.53%90.00210.37%
3Goldman Sachs0.02838.47%20.2403143.79%
4Deutsche Bank0.02527.71%30.02233.93%
5HSBC0.022126.70%60.00531.00%
6Bank of America0.01113.45%40.02133.81%
7Citigroup0.00110.35%80.00310.53%
8Barclays0.00110.31%50.01011.87%
Total0.326490.54793
Average size:0.0070.006
Interest rate structured products, no ETNS, by agent, 2015
2014 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Wells Fargo0.2972222.29%100.06653.64%
2Goldman Sachs0.2821821.20%50.122316.72%
3Morgan Stanley0.2242016.81%30.222912.15%
4Citigroup0.1742313.04%10.5403029.64%
5Barclays0.157311.80%20.2642314.50%
6JPMorgan0.115218.62%40.164188.99%
7Bank of America0.03752.82%90.06863.74%
8Deutsche Bank0.02231.69%80.08284.48%
9Jefferies0.01010.75%
10RBC0.00520.38%70.083104.55%
Total1.3321201.823165
Average size:0.0110.011
Single stock structured products, no ETNS, by agent, 2015
2014 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1UBS1.938175327.03%13.586296231.27%
2JPMorgan1.64749722.97%21.94758416.98%
3Bank of America1.3626319.00%31.8976116.54%
4Morgan Stanley0.5801438.09%50.9051557.89%
5Barclays0.5241297.30%41.21219310.57%
6RBC0.231803.22%60.5893585.14%
7HSBC0.208532.90%90.240422.10%
8Goldman Sachs0.204332.84%80.291152.54%
9Credit Suisse0.176892.46%70.336752.93%
10Citigroup0.166522.31%100.240762.09%
Total7.170293011.4684549
Average size:0.0020.003
Interest rate products with structured coupons (not included above), by agent, 2015
2014 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1First Tennessee4.5551998.04%13.1811567.85%
2Stifel2.8491415.03%51.9811094.89%
3Vining2.6872104.74%101.5821093.90%
4Morgan Stanley2.4231354.28%71.818944.48%
5Raymond James2.4221784.27%41.9991254.93%
6Incapital2.1951753.87%32.2481335.54%
7Piper Jaffray1.9091363.37%190.790501.95%
8Jefferies1.887773.33%22.272815.61%
9Finacorp1.8221583.22%310.338390.83%
10Hapoalim1.715843.03%91.600803.95%
Total56.665217240.5441638
Average size:0.0260.025
Interest rate products with structured coupons (not included above), no agencies, by agent, 2015
2014 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Goldman Sachs0.5146617.29%30.4575418.15%
2Barclays0.5031116.94%10.7002527.84%
3RBC0.4304114.47%20.4794319.06%
4Bank of America0.279229.39%110.02841.11%
5Wells Fargo0.277179.32%70.09193.63%
6TD0.269459.05%130.01820.70%
7Morgan Stanley0.188126.33%50.142105.63%
8JPMorgan0.173485.81%90.066192.63%
9HSBC0.115143.86%100.06072.38%
10Nomura0.05261.75%150.01140.44%
Total2.9703142.516255
Average size:0.0090.010
All structured products, no ETNs, by issuer, 2015
2014 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Barclays Bank plc5.88074713.42%35.09671011.97%
2JPMorgan Chase & Co. 5.616146812.81%15.848127813.74%
3Credit Suisse AG, London Branch 4.86283511.10%25.19267212.20%
4Bank of America Corp. 4.58612210.46%102.383875.60%
5Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.4.41667910.08%43.7875708.90%
6HSBC USA Inc.3.8257228.73%73.2289027.58%
7Morgan Stanley3.0455726.95%92.8744706.75%
8Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch2.5173875.74%63.6515008.58%
9UBS AG, London Branch 2.07717544.74%82.95928086.95%
10Royal Bank of Canada 1.6013703.65%53.6857638.66%
Total43.827845742.5619232
Average size:0.0050.005
All structured products, no ETNs, by issuer, fourth quarter
2014 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Bank of America Corp. 1.3083813.88%100.534205.31%
2Barclays Bank plc1.08716511.53%51.0001449.95%
3Credit Suisse AG, London Branch 0.9401949.97%21.45021414.43%
4GS Finance Corp. (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.)0.85799.10%
5JPMorgan Chase & Co. 0.8442968.96%11.46231814.54%
6HSBC USA Inc.0.7701548.17%90.6142276.11%
7Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.0.6931407.35%31.04515010.40%
8Morgan Stanley0.6221326.60%60.7761367.72%
9UBS AG, London Branch 0.4333374.59%70.6476336.44%
10Royal Bank of Canada 0.311883.30%80.6471296.43%
Total9.422182310.0512216
Average size:0.0050.005
All structured products, no ETNs, by issuer, December
2014 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Barclays Bank plc0.3985813.94%20.3665811.92%
2HSBC USA Inc.0.3365111.77%100.171705.58%
3JPMorgan Chase & Co. 0.33110211.60%50.32910510.73%
4Bank of America Corp. 0.317511.10%120.06342.04%
5Credit Suisse AG, London Branch 0.265799.28%10.4406814.35%
6Bank of Montreal0.169205.92%80.183105.95%
7Morgan Stanley0.166455.79%60.286419.32%
8UBS AG, London Branch 0.1631285.71%70.2062196.71%
9Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.0.154395.38%30.3544811.52%
10Wells Fargo & Co.0.100163.49%130.02740.88%
Total2.8576233.070734
Average size:0.0050.004
All structured products, by issuer, 2015
2014 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Credit Suisse AG, Nassau Branch 12.788104020.75%17.90487014.44%
2Barclays Bank plc7.69975412.49%26.12571911.19%
3JPMorgan Chase & Co. 5.61614689.11%35.848127810.68%
4Credit Suisse AG, London Branch 4.8628357.88%45.1926729.48%
5Bank of America Corp. 4.5861227.44%112.383874.35%
6Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.4.4166797.17%73.7875706.92%
7HSBC USA Inc.3.8257226.21%93.2289025.89%
8UBS AG, London Branch 3.16817695.14%54.30928177.87%
9Morgan Stanley3.0755734.99%102.9574715.40%
10Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch2.5773884.18%63.8355027.00%
Total61.627955654.75610181
Average size:0.0060.005
Commodity structured products, no ETNS, by issuer, 2015
2014 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Barclays Bank plc0.208324.84%20.4782020.58%
2JPMorgan Chase & Co. 0.1765221.02%10.8964038.57%
3Morgan Stanley0.1705720.34%40.2473310.62%
4Citigroup Inc.0.088610.50%100.00310.13%
5Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.0.08349.88%60.10434.49%
6Bank of America Corp. 0.06277.45%50.10884.67%
7UBS AG, London Branch 0.029113.42%70.050212.17%
8Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch0.01541.81%30.4194718.05%
9Bank of the West0.00650.73%90.00640.26%
Total0.8361492.323178
Average size:0.0060.013
Equity index structured products, no ETNS, by issuer, 2015
2014 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Credit Suisse AG, London Branch 4.18857914.23%14.70948321.38%
2Bank of America Corp. 4.1479014.09%71.713547.78%
3Barclays Bank plc3.94044913.39%81.6782497.62%
4Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.3.53256212.00%22.71844112.34%
5HSBC USA Inc.2.8914649.82%32.1665939.84%
6JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2.6166818.89%61.7224157.82%
7Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch1.9582216.65%51.9391908.80%
8Morgan Stanley1.4162574.81%91.1742035.33%
9GS Finance Corp. (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.)0.99393.38%
10UBS AG, London Branch 0.8541572.90%100.7781703.53%
Total29.431401322.0273180
Average size:0.0070.007
Foreign exchange structured products, no ETNS, by issuer, 2015
2014 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.0.1011931.09%10.2593847.37%
2Morgan Stanley0.083225.53%80.00210.37%
3JPMorgan Chase & Co. 0.076923.30%30.1182321.63%
4Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch0.02738.23%20.1282323.43%
5HSBC USA Inc.0.022126.70%60.00531.00%
6Barclays Bank plc0.01223.76%40.01933.44%
7Citigroup Inc.0.00421.37%70.00310.53%
Total0.326490.54793
Average size:0.0070.006
Interest rate structured products, no ETNS, by issuer, 2015
2014 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Wells Fargo & Co.0.2972222.29%100.06653.64%
2Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.0.2821821.20%50.122316.72%
3Morgan Stanley0.2111815.83%70.10265.57%
4Citigroup Inc.0.1742313.04%10.5403029.64%
5Barclays Bank plc0.147211.05%30.181159.95%
6JPMorgan Chase & Co. 0.100207.49%40.164188.99%
7Federal Home Loan Banks0.04043.00%20.197910.81%
8Bank of America Corp. 0.03752.82%110.06553.56%
9Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch0.02231.69%90.07273.94%
10Credit Suisse AG, Nassau Branch 0.00810.60%
Total1.3321201.823165
Average size:0.0110.011
Single stock structured products, no ETNS, by issuer, 2015
2014 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1JPMorgan Chase & Co. 1.62347322.63%22.09056218.23%
2Barclays Bank plc1.17020316.32%12.32933420.31%
3UBS AG, London Branch 1.013145014.12%31.912251616.67%
4Royal Bank of Canada 0.5851528.16%41.15747710.09%
5Morgan Stanley0.5721367.98%50.9061557.90%
6HSBC USA Inc.0.529887.37%70.646805.63%
7Credit Suisse AG, London Branch 0.4221865.88%110.2571062.24%
8Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch0.3791215.28%60.7441786.48%
9Bank of America Corp. 0.331174.61%80.443143.86%
10Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.0.206342.88%90.303182.64%
Total7.170293011.4684549
Average size:0.0020.003
Prospect News Structured Products Rankings
Criteria

• The tables include all dollar-denominated offerings sold in the United States as public, Rule 144A or similar deals reported to Prospect News.

• Offerings are included in the time period in which they price.

• Amounts are based on the total sales price (face amount multiplied by the offering price). The full amount is credited to the lead manager. For multiple managers, the total value is divided equally among all the firms.

• Each tranche is counted as a separate deal.

• Notes are included that convert into or are linked to one or more stocks, indexes, commodities, currencies, interest rates or other assets.

• Interest-rate products with a structured coupon but no underlier, such as step-up notes, step-down notes, fixed-to-floating notes and capped floaters, are listed separately; they are not included in overall totals. Agencies are included in this category.


© 2015 Prospect News.
All content on this website is protected by copyright law in the U.S. and elsewhere. For the use of the person downloading only.
Redistribution and copying are prohibited by law without written permission in advance from Prospect News.
Redistribution or copying includes e-mailing, printing multiple copies or any other form of reproduction.