By Rebecca Melvin
New York, Sept. 5 - International law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP was the top legal counsel to underwriters of convertible bonds for the year to date through August with 29 deals, accounting for $9.41 billion of issuance, or 35% of total volume, according to data compiled by Prospect News.
Davis Polk was also the top ranking legal firm for underwriters for August alone, with $1.04 billion in four deals, or 35%, of the total.
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP was the No. 2 legal counsel to underwriters of convertible bonds for the year to date through August, with $3.31 billion in 10 deals, or 12% of total volume.
Latham & Watkins was the third-busiest legal counsel to underwriters for the year to date with seven deals, totaling $3.08 billion, accounting for 11% of total volume.
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati was the top ranking legal counsel to issuers of convertible bonds for the year to date, serving as counsel on $2.56 billion of issuance in five deals, for 9% of the total. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP was the No. 2 legal counsel to issuers of convertible bonds, with $1.47 billion in two deals, accounting for 5.4% of total volume through August.
For August alone, DLA Piper LLP (US) was the top legal counsel to issuers of convertible debt with $650 million in one deal for 22% of the total.
Details on the legal counsel of all new issues weren't available to Prospect News. Total issuance for the year to date is $27.16 billion in 89 deals, which is up from $13.05 billion in 47 deals notched for 2012 through August.
U.S. market, year to date
2012 Comparables
| Underwriter's counsel | Amount | No. | Share | Rank | Amount | No. | Share
|
1 | Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP | 9.411 | 29 | 34.66% | 1 | 3.131 | 12 | 24.00%
|
2 | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP | 3.311 | 10 | 12.20% | 4 | 1.335 | 4 | 10.23%
|
3 | Latham & Watkins LLP | 3.078 | 7 | 11.34% | 2 | 1.615 | 7 | 12.38%
|
4 | Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP | 1.590 | 4 | 5.86% |
|
5 | Sidley Austin LLP | 0.600 | 1 | 2.21% |
|
6 | Troutman Sanders LLP | 0.490 | 2 | 1.80% | 12 | 0.127 | 1 | 0.97%
|
7 | Clifford Chance US LLP | 0.463 | 2 | 1.70% |
|
8 | Mayer Brown LLP | 0.450 | 1 | 1.66% |
|
9 | Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP | 0.435 | 4 | 1.60% | 17 | 0.043 | 1 | 0.33%
|
10 | Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP | 0.403 | 1 | 1.48% | 8 | 0.483 | 2 | 3.70%
|
| Total | 27.150 | 89 | 13.046 | 47 |
|
|
|
U.S. market, August |
|
| | | | | 2012 Comparables |
|
| Underwriter's counsel | Amount | No. | Share | Rank | Amount | No. | Share
|
1 | Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP | 1.038 | 4 | 34.63% | 1 | 0.915 | 3 | 52.34%
|
2 | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP | 0.517 | 2 | 17.26% |
|
3 | Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | 0.287 | 1 | 9.59% |
|
| Total | 2.998 | 11 | 1.749 | 7 |
|
|
|
U.S. market, year to date |
|
| | | | | 2012 Comparables |
|
| Issuer's counsel | Amount | No. | Share | Rank | Amount | No. | Share
|
1 | Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati PC | 2.560 | 5 | 9.43% | 8 | 0.632 | 2 | 4.84%
|
2 | Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP | 1.470 | 2 | 5.41% |
|
3 | Sullivan & Cromwell LLP | 1.276 | 2 | 4.70% | 2 | 1.069 | 2 | 8.19%
|
4 | Sidley Austin LLP | 1.270 | 3 | 4.68% | 22 | 0.127 | 1 | 0.97%
|
5 | Elvinger Hoss & Prussen | 1.125 | 1 | 4.14% |
|
6 | McGuireWoods LLP | 0.980 | 2 | 3.61% |
|
7 | Latham & Watkins LLP | 0.958 | 4 | 3.53% | 7 | 0.650 | 2 | 4.98%
|
8 | DLA Piper LLP (US) | 0.917 | 2 | 3.38% |
|
9 | Jones Day | 0.825 | 2 | 3.04% | 10 | 0.414 | 1 | 3.17%
|
10 | Fenwick & West LLP | 0.600 | 2 | 2.21% |
|
| Total | 27.150 | 89 | 13.046 | 47 |
|
|
|
U.S. market, August |
|
| | | | | 2012 Comparables |
|
| Issuer's counsel | Amount | No. | Share | Rank | Amount | No. | Share
|
1 | DLA Piper LLP (US) | 0.650 | 1 | 21.68% |
|
2 | Dechert LLP | 0.287 | 1 | 9.59% |
|
3 | Cooley LLP | 0.259 | 1 | 8.63% | 1 | 0.489 | 2 | 27.95%
|
4 | Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | 0.150 | 1 | 5.00% |
|
5 | Lawson Lundell LLP | 0.129 | 1 | 4.32% |
|
6 | Dorsey & Whitney LLP | 0.129 | 1 | 4.32% |
|
7 | Alston & Bird LLP | 0.100 | 1 | 3.34% |
|
| Total | 2.998 | 11 | 1.749 | 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prospect News Convertibles Counsel Rankings
|
|
Criteria
• The tables include all underwritten dollar-denominated offerings sold in the United States as public or Rule 144A deals reported to Prospect News.
• Offerings are included in the time period in which they price.
• Amounts are based on the total sales price (face amount multiplied by the offering price). The full amount is credited to the issuer's counsel or underwriter's counsel.
• Each tranche is counted as a separate deal.
• Bonds are included that convert into the issuer's or another company's stock or the cash equivalent; bonds that convert into other bonds are excluded.
• Structured products are excluded.
• Preferred issues are included using the same criteria as for bonds.
© 2015 Prospect News.
All content on this website is protected by copyright law in the U.S. and elsewhere.
For the use of the person downloading only.
Redistribution and copying are prohibited by law without written permission in advance from Prospect News.
Redistribution or copying includes e-mailing, printing multiple copies or any other form of reproduction.