• Mayer Brown top underwriter in June
By Stephanie N. Rotondo
Phoenix, July 3 - Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP held the number one spot as the top preferred stock underwriters' counsel for the year through June, according to data compiled by Prospect News.
The law firm has advised underwriters on six transactions that totaled $2.71 billion, or 13.14% of the market share.
In second place was Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, with four deals under its belt that raised $2.07 billion, or a 10.06% market share.
Cleary also took the top spot for the second quarter, having counseled on five preferred offerings that raised $2.31 billion, or 17.62% of market share. Davis Polk came in second again, advising underwriters on three transactions that brought in $1.7 billion, or 12.97% of market share.
For June, Mayer Brown LLP was the number one underwriters' counsel. The firm helped underwriters on one $287 million deal.
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP came in second, advising on one $115 million deal during the month.
As for issuers, the top counsel for the year continued to come from in-house. Issuers have sought in-house advice on 11 deals that raised $3.16 billion, or 15.32% of market share, so far this year. In the quarter, in-house counsel was consulted on seven sales that brought in over $2.7 billion, or 20.67% of market share.
In June, in-house advisors tied with Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, both of which advised on a $144 million deal.
Underwriter's counsel, U.S. market, year to date
2012 Comparables
| Underwriter's counsel | Amount | No. | Share | Rank | Amount | No. | Share
|
1 | Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP | 2.709 | 6 | 13.14% | 6 | 1.102 | 5 | 5.46%
|
2 | Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP | 2.074 | 4 | 10.06% | 2 | 2.315 | 2 | 11.47%
|
3 | Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP | 1.910 | 9 | 9.26% | 3 | 1.690 | 6 | 8.37%
|
4 | Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP | 1.789 | 6 | 8.68% | 8 | 0.400 | 1 | 1.98%
|
5 | Morrison & Foerster LLP | 1.000 | 1 | 4.85% |
|
6 | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP | 0.940 | 7 | 4.56% | 5 | 1.171 | 6 | 5.80%
|
7 | Mayer Brown LLP | 0.537 | 2 | 2.61% |
|
8 | Hunton & Williams LLP | 0.494 | 4 | 2.40% | 14 | 0.252 | 5 | 1.25%
|
9 | O'Melveny & Myers LLP | 0.450 | 1 | 2.18% | 4 | 1.585 | 2 | 7.85%
|
10 | Sullivan & Cromwell LLP | 0.440 | 3 | 2.13% | 15 | 0.250 | 1 | 1.24%
|
| Total | 20.615 | 152 | 20.185 | 103 |
|
|
|
Underwriter's counsel, U.S. market, second quarter |
|
| | | | | 2012 Comparables |
|
| Underwriter's counsel | Amount | No. | Share | Rank | Amount | No. | Share
|
1 | Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP | 2.309 | 5 | 17.62% | 5 | 0.619 | 2 | 6.12%
|
2 | Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP | 1.700 | 3 | 12.97% | 1 | 2.250 | 1 | 22.24%
|
3 | Morrison & Foerster LLP | 1.000 | 1 | 7.63% |
|
4 | Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP | 0.795 | 4 | 6.07% |
|
5 | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP | 0.540 | 4 | 4.12% | 3 | 0.712 | 4 | 7.04%
|
6 | O'Melveny & Myers LLP | 0.450 | 1 | 3.43% | 2 | 1.585 | 2 | 15.66%
|
7 | Hunton & Williams LLP | 0.369 | 3 | 2.82% | 9 | 0.065 | 3 | 0.65%
|
8 | Mayer Brown LLP | 0.287 | 1 | 2.19% |
|
9 | Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP | 0.275 | 2 | 2.10% | 4 | 0.635 | 3 | 6.28%
|
10 | Debevoise & Plimpton LLP | 0.275 | 1 | 2.10% |
|
| Total | 13.106 | 64 | 10.118 | 58 |
|
|
|
Underwriter's counsel, U.S. market, June |
|
| | | | | 2012 Comparables |
|
| Underwriter's counsel | Amount | No. | Share | Rank | Amount | No. | Share
|
1 | Mayer Brown LLP | 0.287 | 1 | 41.34% |
|
2 | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP | 0.115 | 1 | 16.54% |
|
3 | Latham & Watkins LLP | 0.063 | 1 | 9.06% |
|
4 | Hunton & Williams LLP | 0.050 | 1 | 7.19% | 5 | 0.006 | 1 | 0.18%
|
5 | Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP | 0.020 | 1 | 2.88% |
|
6 | Dentons US LLP | 0.007 | 1 | 1.04% |
|
| Total | 0.695 | 18 | 3.403 | 24 |
|
|
|
Issuer's counsel, U.S. market, year to date |
|
| | | | | 2012 Comparables |
|
| Issuer's counsel | Amount | No. | Share | Rank | Amount | No. | Share
|
1 | In house | 3.159 | 11 | 15.32% | 1 | 3.964 | 9 | 19.64%
|
2 | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP | 1.336 | 3 | 6.48% | 13 | 0.200 | 1 | 0.99%
|
3 | Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP | 1.301 | 3 | 6.31% | 15 | 0.150 | 1 | 0.74%
|
4 | McGuireWoods LLP | 1.000 | 1 | 4.85% |
|
5 | Hogan Lovells US LLP | 0.750 | 3 | 3.64% | 3 | 1.476 | 8 | 7.31%
|
6 | Hunton & Williams LLP | 0.647 | 8 | 3.14% | 26 | 0.079 | 2 | 0.39%
|
7 | Sullivan & Cromwell LLP | 0.589 | 5 | 2.85% | 7 | 0.423 | 4 | 2.10%
|
8 | Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP | 0.556 | 3 | 2.70% | 24 | 0.080 | 1 | 0.40%
|
9 | Venable LLP | 0.516 | 3 | 2.50% | 6 | 0.649 | 9 | 3.21%
|
10 | Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP | 0.412 | 2 | 2.00% | 9 | 0.287 | 1 | 1.42%
|
| Total | 20.615 | 152 | 20.185 | 103 |
|
|
|
Issuer's counsel, U.S. market, second quarter |
|
| | | | | 2012 Comparables |
|
| Issuer's counsel | Amount | No. | Share | Rank | Amount | No. | Share
|
1 | In house | 2.709 | 7 | 20.67% | 1 | 3.356 | 5 | 33.17%
|
2 | Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP | 1.266 | 2 | 9.66% |
|
3 | McGuireWoods LLP | 1.000 | 1 | 7.63% |
|
4 | Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP | 0.556 | 3 | 4.24% | 11 | 0.080 | 1 | 0.79%
|
5 | Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP | 0.300 | 1 | 2.29% |
|
6 | Hunton & Williams LLP | 0.291 | 3 | 2.22% | 18 | 0.050 | 1 | 0.49%
|
7 | Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP | 0.287 | 1 | 2.19% |
|
8 | Latham & Watkins LLP | 0.250 | 1 | 1.91% | 28 | 0.018 | 1 | 0.17%
|
9 | Conyers Dill & Pearman Ltd. | 0.250 | 2 | 1.91% |
|
10 | Squire Sanders (US) LLP | 0.225 | 1 | 1.72% |
|
| Total | 13.106 | 64 | 10.118 | 58 |
|
|
|
Issuer's counsel, U.S. market, June |
|
| | | | | 2012 Comparables |
|
| Issuer's counsel | Amount | No. | Share | Rank | Amount | No. | Share
|
1 | In house | 0.144 | 1 | 20.67% | 1 | 2.281 | 2 | 67.04%
|
2 | Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP | 0.144 | 1 | 20.67% |
|
3 | Sidley Austin LLP | 0.115 | 1 | 16.54% |
|
4 | Vinson & Elkins LLP | 0.063 | 1 | 9.06% |
|
5 | Beggs & Lane | 0.050 | 1 | 7.19% |
|
6 | Kirkland & Ellis LLP | 0.010 | 1 | 1.44% |
|
7 | Cozen O'Connor | 0.010 | 1 | 1.44% |
|
8 | LeClairRyan | 0.007 | 1 | 1.04% |
|
| Total | 0.695 | 18 | 3.403 | 24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prospect News Preferred Stock Counsel Rankings
|
|
Criteria
• The tables include all underwritten dollar-denominated offerings sold in the United States as public or Rule 144A deals reported to Prospect News.
• Convertibles are excluded.
• Offerings are included in the time period in which they price.
• Amounts are based on the total sales price (face amount multiplied by the offering price). The full amount is credited to the issuer's counsel or underwriter's counsel. For multiple firms, the total value is divided equally.
© 2015 Prospect News.
All content on this website is protected by copyright law in the U.S. and elsewhere.
For the use of the person downloading only.
Redistribution and copying are prohibited by law without written permission in advance from Prospect News.
Redistribution or copying includes e-mailing, printing multiple copies or any other form of reproduction.