E-mail us: service@prospectnews.com Or call: 212 374 2800
Bank Loans - CLOs - Convertibles - Distressed Debt - Emerging Markets
Green Finance - High Yield - Investment Grade - Liability Management
Preferreds - Private Placements - Structured Products
 
Published on 10/3/2013 in the Prospect News Convertibles Daily.

Davis Polk top legal counsel to underwriters of convertible bonds for year to date

By Rebecca Melvin

New York, Oct. 3 - International law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP was the top legal counsel to underwriters of convertible bonds for the year to date through September with 32 deals, accounting for $10.46 billion of issuance, or 35% of total volume, according to data compiled by Prospect News.

Davis Polk was also the top ranking legal firm for underwriters for the third quarter and for September alone, with $2.37 billion of issuance in nine deals, for 33% of the total for the quarter and $1.05 million in three deals for 40% of the total for September.

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP was the No. 2 legal counsel to underwriters of convertible bonds for the year to date through September, with $3.31 billion in 10 deals, or 11% of total volume.

Latham & Watkins was the third-busiest legal counsel to underwriters for the year to date with nine deals, totaling $3.30 billion, accounting for 11% of total volume.

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati was the top ranking legal counsel to issuers of convertible bonds for the year to date, acting as counsel on $2.56 billion of issuance in five deals, for 8.6% of the total. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP was the No. 2 legal counsel to issuers of convertible bonds, with $1.47 billion in two deals, accounting for 4.9% of total volume through September.

For the third quarter and September alone, Ropes & Gray LLP was the top legal counsel to issuers of convertible debt with $800 million in two deals for 11% of the total. In September, the two Ropes & Gray deals accounted for 30% of total volume.

Details on the legal counsel of all new issues weren't available to Prospect News. Total issuance for the year to date is $29.16 billion in 100 deals, which is up from $15.95 billion in 61 deals notched for 2012 through September.

U.S. market, year to date

2012 Comparables

Underwriter's counselAmountNo.ShareRankAmountNo.Share
1Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP10.4603235.06%13.9461724.74%
2Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP3.3111011.10%41.33548.37%
3Latham & Watkins LLP3.297911.05%22.244914.07%
4Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP1.75555.88%
5Hunton & Williams LLP0.78322.62%51.27437.99%
6Sidley Austin LLP0.60012.01%
7Troutman Sanders LLP0.49021.64%130.12710.80%
8Clifford Chance US LLP0.46321.55%
9Mayer Brown LLP0.45011.51%
10Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP0.43541.46%110.22731.42%
Total29.84010015.95161
U.S. market, third quarter
2012 Comparables
Underwriter's counselAmountNo.ShareRankAmountNo.Share
1Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP2.368933.00%11.817935.57%
2Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP0.51727.21%
3Hunton & Williams LLP0.48716.79%30.630112.34%
4Sullivan & Cromwell LLP0.30014.18%50.28715.63%
5Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati0.28714.01%
6Latham & Watkins LLP0.21923.05%20.745314.59%
7Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP0.16712.33%
8Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP0.16512.30%
9McGuireWoods LLP0.15512.16%
10Morrison & Foerster LLP0.12911.80%80.10011.96%
Total7.177315.10724
U.S. market, September
2012 Comparables
Underwriter's counselAmountNo.ShareRankAmountNo.Share
1Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP1.050339.77%10.815528.06%
2Hunton & Williams LLP0.487118.47%20.630121.71%
3Latham & Watkins LLP0.21928.30%30.630221.69%
4Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP0.16516.25%
5Morrison & Foerster LLP0.12914.90%50.10013.44%
Total2.640112.90514
U.S. market, year to date
2012 Comparables
Issuer's counselAmountNo.ShareRankAmountNo.Share
1Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati PC2.56058.58%90.63223.96%
2Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP1.47024.93%
3Sidley Austin LLP1.35344.53%260.12710.79%
4Sullivan & Cromwell LLP1.27624.27%21.06926.70%
5Elvinger Hoss & Prussen1.12513.77%
6McGuireWoods LLP0.98023.28%
7Latham & Watkins LLP0.95843.21%80.65024.08%
8DLA Piper LLP (US)0.91723.07%
9Jones Day0.82522.76%140.41412.60%
10Ropes & Gray LLP0.80022.68%120.52023.26%
Total29.84010015.95161
U.S. market, third quarter
2012 Comparables
Issuer's counselAmountNo.ShareRankAmountNo.Share
1Ropes & Gray LLP0.800211.15%40.520210.18%
2DLA Piper LLP (US)0.65019.06%
3Morrison & Foerster LLP0.31924.44%
4Proskauer Rose LLP0.31014.32%
5Thompson Hine LLP0.30014.18%
6Dechert LLP0.28714.01%
7Cooley LLP0.25913.61%10.719414.07%
8Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP0.24413.40%20.630112.34%
9Squire Sanders (US) LLP0.24413.40%
10Keller Rohrback PLC0.16712.33%
Total7.177315.10724
U.S. market, September
2012 Comparables
Issuer's counselAmountNo.ShareRankAmountNo.Share
1Ropes & Gray LLP0.800230.30%50.22017.57%
2Morrison & Foerster LLP0.319212.08%
3Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP0.24419.23%10.630121.71%
4Squire Sanders (US) LLP0.24419.23%
5Vinson & Elkins LLP0.15015.68%
6Seyfarth Shaw LLP0.12914.90%
7Sidley Austin LLP0.08313.13%
8Conyers Dill & Pearman Ltd.0.08313.13%
Total2.640112.90514
Prospect News Convertibles Counsel Rankings
Criteria

• The tables include all underwritten dollar-denominated offerings sold in the United States as public or Rule 144A deals reported to Prospect News.

• Offerings are included in the time period in which they price.

• Amounts are based on the total sales price (face amount multiplied by the offering price). The full amount is credited to the issuer's counsel or underwriter's counsel.

• Each tranche is counted as a separate deal.

• Bonds are included that convert into the issuer's or another company's stock or the cash equivalent; bonds that convert into other bonds are excluded.

• Structured products are excluded.

• Preferred issues are included using the same criteria as for bonds.


© 2015 Prospect News.
All content on this website is protected by copyright law in the U.S. and elsewhere. For the use of the person downloading only.
Redistribution and copying are prohibited by law without written permission in advance from Prospect News.
Redistribution or copying includes e-mailing, printing multiple copies or any other form of reproduction.