By Rebecca Melvin
New York, Aug. 3 - International law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP remained on top of the legal league tables as the most active legal counsel to underwriters of convertible bonds for the year to date through July, according to data compiled by Prospect News.
Davis Polk accounted for 19.3% of total volume under its guidance, or $2.20 billion in nine deals, according to the data.
Latham & Watkins LLP remained the No. 2 counsel, with the global law firm accounting for $1.6 billion of issuance in seven deals, or 14% of the total.
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP took the third slot in the rankings of legal counsel to convertible underwriters, with $1.34 billion in issuance in four deals, or 11.7% of the total, and Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP ranked fourth, with $1.17 billion in convertibles issuance under its guidance via the underwriters.
As for legal counsel to issuers of convertible debt, Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz jumped to the top position with $1.1 billion in new issuance in one deal for 9.7% of total volume.
A close second was international law firm Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, which provided legal counsel to issuers of $1.1 billion of convertibles in two deals for 9.6% of the total.
Nine percent of issuers used in-house legal counsel, which accounted for $1.04 billion in issuance in three deals for the year to date through June.
K&L Gates LLP was the fourth-ranking legal counsel to issuers for the year to date with $785 million of issuance, or 6.9% of total volume of issuance under its guidance.
Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP was fifth, with $690 million of issuance for 6%.
Details on the legal counsel of all new issues weren't available to Prospect News. Total issuance for the year to date is $11.4 billion in 40 deals, which is down from $22.8 billion in 72 deals for the same period of 2011.
U.S. market, year to date
2011 Comparables
| Underwriter's counsel | Amount | No. | Share | Rank | Amount | No. | Share
|
1 | Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP | 2.199 | 9 | 19.29% | 2 | 4.551 | 21 | 19.98%
|
2 | Latham & Watkins LLP | 1.598 | 7 | 14.01% | 5 | 2.077 | 7 | 9.12%
|
3 | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP | 1.335 | 4 | 11.71% | 4 | 2.256 | 9 | 9.91%
|
4 | Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP | 1.165 | 3 | 10.22% | 6 | 1.981 | 4 | 8.70%
|
5 | Sullivan & Cromwell LLP | 1.100 | 1 | 9.65% | 9 | 0.350 | 1 | 1.54%
|
6 | Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP | 0.862 | 2 | 7.56% | 7 | 0.859 | 5 | 3.77%
|
7 | Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP | 0.670 | 3 | 5.88% | 13 | 0.155 | 1 | 0.68%
|
8 | Hunton & Williams LLP | 0.644 | 2 | 5.65% |
|
9 | Morrison & Foerster LLP | 0.200 | 1 | 1.75% |
|
10 | Baker Botts LLP | 0.150 | 1 | 1.32% | 15 | 0.135 | 1 | 0.59%
|
| Total | 11.401 | 40 | 22.773 | 72 |
|
|
|
U.S. market, year to date |
|
| | | | | 2011 Comparables |
|
| Issuer's counsel | Amount | No. | Share | Rank | Amount | No. | Share
|
1 | Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | 1.100 | 1 | 9.65% |
|
2 | Sullivan & Cromwell LLP | 1.069 | 2 | 9.38% | 11 | 0.613 | 2.000 | 2.69%
|
3 | In house | 1.043 | 3 | 9.15% |
|
4 | K&L Gates LLP | 0.785 | 2 | 6.89% |
|
5 | Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP | 0.690 | 1 | 6.05% |
|
6 | Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | 0.632 | 2 | 5.54% | 7 | 0.765 | 3 | 3.36%
|
7 | Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP | 0.550 | 3 | 4.82% | 18 | 0.255 | 2 | 1.12%
|
8 | Hogan Lovells US LLP | 0.520 | 2 | 4.56% |
|
9 | Latham & Watkins LLP | 0.500 | 1 | 4.39% | 5 | 0.999 | 5 | 4.39%
|
10 | DLA Piper LLP | 0.350 | 2 | 3.07% | 14 | 0.403 | 1 | 1.77%
|
| Total | 11.401 | 40 | 22.773 | 72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prospect News Convertibles Counsel Rankings
|
|
Criteria
• The tables include all underwritten dollar-denominated offerings sold in the United States as public or Rule 144A deals reported to Prospect News.
• Offerings are included in the time period in which they price.
• Amounts are based on the total sales price (face amount multiplied by the offering price). The full amount is credited to the issuer's counsel or underwriter's counsel.
• Each tranche is counted as a separate deal.
• Bonds are included that convert into the issuer's or another company's stock or the cash equivalent; bonds that convert into other bonds are excluded.
• Structured products are excluded.
• Preferred issues are included using the same criteria as for bonds.
© 2015 Prospect News.
All content on this website is protected by copyright law in the U.S. and elsewhere.
For the use of the person downloading only.
Redistribution and copying are prohibited by law without written permission in advance from Prospect News.
Redistribution or copying includes e-mailing, printing multiple copies or any other form of reproduction.