E-mail us: service@prospectnews.com Or call: 212 374 2800
Bank Loans - CLOs - Convertibles - Distressed Debt - Emerging Markets
Green Finance - High Yield - Investment Grade - Liability Management
Preferreds - Private Placements - Structured Products
 
Published on 3/3/2016 in the Prospect News Structured Products Daily.

Goldman Sachs keeps lead as top U.S. structured notes agent for year to date

By Emma Trincal

New York, March 3 – For the second month in a row, Goldman Sachs beat Bank of America as the top agent in the structured notes market, according to data compiled by Prospect News for the first two months of the year.

Bank of America has been the leader month after month and year after year. Some attribute Goldman’s fresh lead to what made it lead last month’s league tables as well – an exceptionally big offering, which priced at the end of January.

It was Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.’s $1.07 billion of 13-month 0% leveraged notes linked to a basket of unequally weighted indexes. Those were the Euro Stoxx 50 index, the FTSE 100 index and the Topix index.

A biggie

Goldman Sachs so far this year sold $1.69 billion in 135 deals, or 24.79% of the total volume. Following closely behind by a gap of about $125 million is Bank of America, which priced 67 offerings totaling $1.56 billion, or 22.97% of the total.

Goldman Sachs last year was third, a ranking now held by JPMorgan, moving down one notch from second. Barclays, last year’s No. 5 agent, moved up one notch.

In February, the top agent was Bank of America with $571 million, or 26.97% of the market, while Goldman was third with $265 million, or 12.49% of the total. JPMorgan was between the two with $361 million, or 16.98% of the total.

This suggests that Goldman’s big offering in January was a critical factor behind its year-to-date ranking as the firm lost its momentum last month.

Bank of America last month priced a few sizable deals.

The first one was Bank of America Corp.’s $145.16 million of 14-month leveraged notes linked to the S&P 500 index.

The second was Credit Suisse AG, London Branch’s $83.8 million of two-year capped leveraged notes linked to the S&P 500.

Finally, Bank of America issued $74.28 million of 14-month leveraged notes linked to the Euro Stoxx 50.

Slowdown

Meanwhile, the overall market is showing signs of weakness.

Agents so far this year have priced $6.81 billion, a 22.5% decline from the $8.77 billion sold in the first two months of last year.

The number of deals fell as well to 1,187 from 1,462, a drop of about 19%.

A look at the league tables based on the underlying asset class is relative. Some underlying classes did better than others. Some did pretty poorly.

Commodities issuance for instance is barely surviving. Agents this year priced only $13 million of commodity-linked notes, a 95% decline from $240 million a year ago. The number of deals, which was 42 last year, has dropped to eight.

JPMorgan is the top agent in this category with 71% of the volume.

Foreign exchange issuance has continued to collapse, falling 28% to $31 million from $43 million. JPMorgan is also the lead with 81% of the total.

Equities

The most commonly used asset classes, equity indexes and single stocks, have both registered a decline in volume, which is uncommon, at least for equity indexes, as this asset class is usually growing.

Agents sold $5.67 billion of equity index-linked notes in January and February, a nearly 5% decline from the same period the year before.

In comparison, volume in this asset class grew 42% from the first two months of 2014 to the same period of 2015, according to data compiled by Prospect News.

The top agent in equity indexes this year was Goldman Sachs with $1.64 billion, followed by Bank of America, the traditional leader with $1.46 billion. The narrow gap between the two again seems to indicate that Goldman’s ranking is the result of its giant deal.

Deals were smaller on average with 780 offerings this year versus 621 last year.

Single-stock issuance continued to weaken but at an accelerated pace. Agents sold $374 million in this asset class versus $1.54 billion last year, a 76% decline in notional.

During the same period last year, volume in this asset class had dropped 30% from 2014.

Pricing occurred in fewer deals. Their number dropped by two-thirds to 213 from 572.

JPMorgan took UBS’ slot as top agent, pricing 37 deals amounting to $80 million. UBS is now ranked No. 3. Its decline is due to the strong reduction in the number of deals it priced, falling 72% to 104 from 368.

Rates

Interest rate issuance is also down.

Traditional rate deals amount to only $47 million this year, down by nearly half from last year’s $84 million. Wells Fargo kept is ranking as the top agent.

Interest-rate products with a structured coupon but no underlier, such as step-up notes, step-down notes, fixed-to-floating notes and capped floaters, have dropped too.

Those products, however, are not included in the overall totals and are listed separately.

Structured coupon issuance amounted to $6.32 billion versus $11.73 billion, a decline a nearly half.

First Tennessee remains the first agent with $396 million.

Issuers

Credit Suisse remains the top issuer for all products with nearly 30% of the total in 194 deals totaling $2.96 billion.

Goldman Sachs is the No. 1 issuer for equity index products.

Barclays Bank plc is the most commonly used credit for single-stock deals, taking the place of JPMorgan Chase & Co., now second.

JPMorgan is the first name used for the issuance of commodities and currency notes.

Wells Fargo & Co. tops for rate products.

All structured products, no ETNS, by agent, year to date

2015 Comparables

UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Goldman Sachs1.68713524.79%31.33510715.23%
2Bank of America1.5646722.97%12.3667226.98%
3JPMorgan1.13527716.67%21.78431220.35%
4Barclays0.4571036.72%50.588916.71%
5Morgan Stanley0.356715.23%60.438844.99%
6UBS0.3551685.21%40.97747011.15%
7Citigroup0.245513.61%90.232422.65%
8Credit Suisse0.2311013.39%70.255722.90%
9BMO0.204403.00%80.236192.69%
10HSBC0.184722.71%100.189992.15%
Total6.80711878.7681462
Average size:0.0060.006
All structured products, by agent, year to date
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Credit Suisse3.17928831.58%22.11322919.39%
2Goldman Sachs1.68713516.76%41.33510712.25%
3Bank of America1.5646715.53%12.3667221.71%
4JPMorgan1.13527711.27%31.78431216.37%
5UBS0.6551736.51%51.23047211.29%
6Barclays0.4571034.54%60.588915.40%
7Morgan Stanley0.356713.53%70.438844.01%
8Citigroup0.245512.44%90.232422.13%
9BMO0.204402.03%80.236192.17%
10HSBC0.184721.83%100.189991.73%
Total10.067138810.8991637
Average size:0.0070.007
ETNS, by agent, year to date
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Credit Suisse2.94818790.46%11.85815787.21%
2UBS0.30059.20%20.253211.86%
3Nuveen0.01190.34%30.020160.92%
Total3.2602012.130175
Average size:0.0160.012
All structured products, no ETNS, by agent, February
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Bank of America0.5712626.87%11.1613731.37%
2JPMorgan0.36110716.98%20.63716717.21%
3Goldman Sachs0.2656212.49%40.278517.52%
4Morgan Stanley0.191379.01%60.220365.96%
5UBS0.149837.03%30.50521813.66%
6Barclays0.144406.78%50.271507.33%
7Citigroup0.098194.63%70.184294.97%
8HSBC0.093284.39%100.107522.90%
9Credit Suisse0.092384.34%80.113343.06%
10RBC0.066213.10%90.109272.93%
Total2.1244943.700735
Average size:0.0040.005
Commodity structured products, no ETNS, by agent, year to date
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1JPMorgan0.009671.08%20.0671827.91%
2UBS0.003124.32%70.00110.28%
3Morgan Stanley0.00114.60%30.0551222.86%
Total0.01380.24042
Average size:0.0020.006
Equity index structured products, no ETNS, by agent, year to date
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Goldman Sachs1.63512328.82%31.1669119.55%
2Bank of America1.4555925.64%12.0265533.97%
3JPMorgan0.92919916.38%21.18713719.90%
4Barclays0.382736.74%50.369536.18%
5Morgan Stanley0.261474.59%70.153332.57%
6Citigroup0.220383.87%100.073201.22%
7UBS0.199343.51%40.510678.55%
8Credit Suisse0.184783.24%60.181493.03%
9HSBC0.135502.39%80.131692.20%
10Deutsche Bank0.075131.33%110.02760.45%
Total5.6737805.964621
Average size:0.0070.010
Foreign exchange structured products, no ETNS, by agent, year to date
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1JPMorgan0.026282.08%20.018941.00%
2Barclays0.006117.92%
Total0.03130.04312
Average size:0.0100.004
Interest rate structured products, no ETNS, by agent, year to date
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Wells Fargo0.018238.10%10.027132.39%
2Goldman Sachs0.016133.12%70.00333.54%
3Citigroup0.011122.38%20.019323.14%
4Incapital0.00214.26%
5Morgan Stanley0.00112.13%50.00718.30%
Total0.04760.08413
Average size:0.0080.006
Single stock structured products, no ETNS, by agent, year to date
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1JPMorgan0.0803721.55%20.38210324.80%
2Bank of America0.073419.62%30.2651017.18%
3UBS0.06010416.11%10.43436828.14%
4Barclays0.0411710.88%40.128228.28%
5Morgan Stanley0.03087.93%50.108217.02%
6Credit Suisse0.024165.49%100.015100.96%
7RBC0.02396.17%70.053173.44%
8HSBC0.02376.08%90.02271.46%
9Goldman Sachs0.00932.42%60.09225.94%
10Citigroup0.00962.34%80.043122.78%
Total0.3742131.542572
Average size:0.0020.003
Interest rate products with structured coupons (not included above), by agent, year to date
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1First Tennessee0.396166.26%20.833357.10%
2Multi-Bank0.390246.17%390.05750.48%
3Guggenheim0.258124.09%170.221181.88%
4Vining0.230223.64%30.655405.58%
5Finacorp0.223143.53%160.225251.92%
6Piper Jaffray0.218103.45%140.237202.02%
7Incapital0.207153.27%110.388313.31%
8Wells Fargo0.171102.70%280.10020.85%
9RBC0.150112.37%410.04770.40%
10SunTrust0.147142.33%250.127111.09%
Total6.32023611.730403
Average size:0.0270.029
Interest rate products with structured coupons (not included above), no agencies, by agent, year to date
2015 Comparables
UnderwriterAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Wells Fargo0.087638.82%
2Bank of America0.040217.92%110.01012.33%
3RBC0.038417.10%50.03468.02%
4Goldman Sachs0.024310.47%20.0871020.31%
5BMO0.01034.64%
6TD0.01044.45%40.046710.77%
7Citigroup0.00823.56%80.01743.99%
8Morgan Stanley0.00512.23%120.00611.40%
9HSBC0.00110.60%70.02215.03%
10Barclays0.00110.22%10.108425.11%
Total0.225270.42951
Average size:0.0080.008
All structured products, no ETNs, by issuer, year to date
2015 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.1.2622918.54%11.38312015.77%
2Barclays Bank plc0.68711810.09%31.35811515.49%
3Credit Suisse AG, London Branch 0.6781449.96%21.36214115.53%
4JPMorgan Chase & Co. 0.6061968.90%41.05826112.06%
5Bank of America Corp. 0.580158.52%60.693197.91%
6GS Finance Corp. (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.)0.4491086.60%
7HSBC USA Inc.0.447946.56%50.6971307.95%
8Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch0.377395.54%100.270583.08%
9Morgan Stanley0.346725.08%70.454875.18%
10Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce 0.325164.77%
Total6.80711878.7681462
Average size:0.0060.006
All structured products, by issuer, year to date
2015 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Credit Suisse AG, Nassau Branch 2.96019429.40%11.90316317.46%
2Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.1.2622912.54%21.38312012.69%
3Barclays Bank plc0.6871186.82%41.35811512.46%
4Credit Suisse AG, London Branch 0.6751436.71%31.36214112.50%
5JPMorgan Chase & Co. 0.6061966.02%51.0582619.71%
6Bank of America Corp. 0.580155.76%70.693196.36%
7UBS AG, London Branch 0.5051455.02%80.6493495.96%
8GS Finance Corp. (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.)0.4491084.46%
9HSBC USA Inc.0.447944.44%60.6971306.40%
10Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch0.377393.75%110.270582.48%
Total10.067138810.8991637
Average size:0.0070.007
Commodity structured products, no ETNS, by issuer, year to date
2015 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1JPMorgan Chase & Co. 0.009671.08%30.0501420.93%
2UBS AG, London Branch 0.003124.32%60.01044.19%
3Morgan Stanley0.00114.60%20.0551222.86%
Total0.01380.24042
Average size:0.0020.006
Equity index structured products, no ETNS, by issuer, year to date
2015 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.1.2382721.82%21.2079920.23%
2Credit Suisse AG, London Branch 0.63011210.91%11.25310321.01%
3Bank of America Corp. 0.5721410.08%40.576139.66%
4Barclays Bank plc0.538859.48%31.0355717.35%
5GS Finance Corp. (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.)0.421987.41%
6JPMorgan Chase & Co. 0.4131257.29%60.4941098.28%
7HSBC USA Inc.0.382696.74%50.519838.71%
8Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch0.333335.86%100.114171.90%
9Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce 0.325165.73%
10Morgan Stanley0.267504.71%80.193393.24%
Total5.6737805.964621
Average size:0.0070.010
Foreign exchange structured products, no ETNS, by issuer, year to date
2015 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1JPMorgan Chase & Co. 0.026282.08%20.009320.96%
2Barclays Bank plc0.006117.92%
Total0.03130.04312
Average size:0.0100.004
Interest rate structured products, no ETNS, by issuer, year to date
2015 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Wells Fargo & Co.0.018238.10%10.027132.39%
2Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.0.016133.12%60.00333.54%
3Citigroup Inc.0.011122.38%30.019323.14%
4Credit Suisse AG, Nassau Branch 0.00214.26%
5Morgan Stanley0.00112.13%40.00718.30%
Total0.04760.08413
Average size:0.0080.006
Single stock structured products, no ETNS, by issuer, year to date
2015 Comparables
IssuerAmountNo.ShareRank AmountNo.Share
1Barclays Bank plc0.0931824.82%20.2184014.15%
2JPMorgan Chase & Co. 0.0713318.95%10.3829324.80%
3UBS AG, London Branch 0.05910315.67%40.17128511.06%
4Morgan Stanley0.02977.66%60.105196.83%
5Credit Suisse AG, London Branch 0.028207.46%100.045242.89%
6HSBC USA Inc.0.02486.49%50.116207.52%
7Royal Bank of Canada 0.02396.17%30.1934612.55%
8Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch0.01934.96%70.097306.30%
9GS Finance Corp. (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.)0.00932.42%
10Citigroup Inc.0.00962.34%110.043122.78%
Total0.3742131.542572
Average size:0.0020.003
Prospect News Structured Products Rankings
Criteria

• The tables include all dollar-denominated offerings sold in the United States as public, Rule 144A or similar deals reported to Prospect News.

• Offerings are included in the time period in which they price.

• Amounts are based on the total sales price (face amount multiplied by the offering price). The full amount is credited to the lead manager. For multiple managers, the total value is divided equally among all the firms.

• Each tranche is counted as a separate deal.

• Notes are included that convert into or are linked to one or more stocks, indexes, commodities, currencies, interest rates or other assets.

• Interest-rate products with a structured coupon but no underlier, such as step-up notes, step-down notes, fixed-to-floating notes and capped floaters, are listed separately; they are not included in overall totals. Agencies are included in this category.


© 2015 Prospect News.
All content on this website is protected by copyright law in the U.S. and elsewhere. For the use of the person downloading only.
Redistribution and copying are prohibited by law without written permission in advance from Prospect News.
Redistribution or copying includes e-mailing, printing multiple copies or any other form of reproduction.